AssuredIntent

Technology & Software

An approval should say what it permits

Imagine an operations team asking permission to update a set of internal project records. A short yes in a conversation may leave the actual scope unclear. This hypothetical example shows how a small approval record can connect the request, the response and the later task without assuming permission for unrelated work.

Describe the action and the affected set — AssuredIntentPurpose and permission,kept distinctRequestDecisionActionSpecify the affected set

01

Describe the action and the affected set

Write what is proposed and identify the records or items involved. In the example, the request could concern correcting project labels in a defined list, while leaving ownership and access settings unchanged. Include the purpose and any assumptions the reviewer needs to understand. If the list is still changing, make that explicit rather than treating it as a fixed scope. A person reviewing the request should be able to tell which action they are being asked to approve and which resources are included in that decision.

Keep the response attached to the version reviewed — AssuredIntentPurpose and permission,kept distinctRequestDecisionActionPreserve the reviewedversion

02

Keep the response attached to the version reviewed

Record the decision maker, the response and the request version it concerns. Preserve conditions, such as a required review of the proposed corrections before execution, beside the decision. A later revision should not silently inherit an earlier approval when it materially changes the task. In the project-record example, adding another set of records would be a visible change for the team to assess. This is a documentation method, not a substitute for an implemented permission system or the organisation rules that govern who can authorise the work.

Close the loop with what actually happened — AssuredIntentPurpose and permission,kept distinctRequestDecisionActionRecord what actuallyhappened

03

Close the loop with what actually happened

After the task, record the completed action separately from the original proposal. Identify items that were skipped, changed or left unresolved, and preserve any questions that need another decision. For the hypothetical update, the completion record might show that one ambiguous label was held for clarification rather than guessed. That distinction helps the next person understand the outcome without assuming that approval means every requested change was completed. A useful record links purpose, authorised scope and actual work while keeping each of those stages individually understandable.

Build brief ↗

Explore AssuredIntent

Held for potential development. Acquisition inquiries may be considered.

Domain options ↗